nature geneticsARCHIVESEARCHINFORMATIONCLASSIFIEDSUBSCRIBE
Users\


Return to TOC
Previous Article AbstractFULL TEXTNext Article Abstract
Full Text PDF

 
 
References
FIGTAB
 
doi:10.1038/ng976
volume 32 supplement pp 63 - 65

 
 
Question 11
An investigator has identified and cloned a human gene, but no corresponding mouse ortholog has yet been identified. How can a mouse genomic sequence with similarity to the human gene sequence be retrieved?

For purposes of this example, assume that the user does not already have the human sequence of interest to hand. The first step will be to locate the human gene of interest using the UCSC Genome Browser. Begin by pointing to the UCSC Genome Browser home page, at http://genome.ucsc.edu. Select Human from the Organism pull-down menu and then click on Browser; both are located on the blue navigation bar at the left side of the page. This will take the user to the Human Genome Browser Gateway. Select the Dec. 2001 version of the UCSC genome assembly, type the gene symbol 'AGPS' into the position box, and then click Submit. On the resulting page, follow the link for AGPS in the Known Genes section.

The result of the search on AGPS is shown in Fig. 11.1. In the main figure are a series of 'tracks', which are labeled along the left-hand side. The Known Gene track is for AGPS, corresponding to the query. Clicking on AGPS returns a summary of information on that gene, including the full name of the protein product (alkylglycerone phosphate synthase precursor), a link to the GeneCards database at the Weizmann Institute20 and links to the translated protein, mRNA and genomic sequences. Focus now on the track labeled Mouse Translated Blat Alignments. What is shown in this track are the results of aligning the November 2001 version of the mouse genome assembly with the human genome using the program BLAT8 in its translated protein mode. More details about the BLAT algorithm and about how the mouse BLAT track is automatically generated can be found by clicking on the Mouse Blat hyperlink found below the main graphical display.

Click anywhere within the Mouse Blat track to expand the single BLAT track so that it now shows each individual mouse sequence that aligns with human sequence in the region of interest (Fig. 11.2). Especially in a translated mode, mouse and human gene sequences are usually more similar in exons than in introns. Look carefully at the two alignments that derive from a mouse sequence called chr3 81178k (Fig. 11.2, arrow). On the Mouse Blat track, the brown vertical lines represent alignments and the horizontal lines are gaps. These alignments correspond to the blue vertical lines indicating the exons of AGPS on the Known Genes track.

To see the kind of information available for a translated BLAT alignment, click on the mouse genomic sequence labeled chr3 81178k. The resulting page (Fig. 11.3) provides the details of the alignment of the trace with the human genome assembly. This mouse genomic sequence is 607 nt in length and aligns with the human sequence in eight blocks. Within the blocks, the mouse and human sequences are 78% identical. To view the alignment itself, click on the View details of parts of alignment... link. On the resulting page (Fig. 11.4), the mouse sequence is shown on top, with the region of alignment in blue. The human genomic sequence is shown next, and a side-by-side alignment of the human and mouse sequences is at the bottom of the web page (not shown).


 
Top
References
FIGTAB
 
 
GENETICS  
REFERENCES
  1. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860-921 (2001). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  2. Collins, F.S. and McKusick, V.A. Implications of the Human Genome Project for medical science. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 285, 540-544 (2001). | Article | ChemPort |
  3. Watson, J.D. & Crick, F.H.C. Molecular structure of nucleic acids: a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171, 737-738 (1953). | ChemPort |
  4. Green, E.D. Strategies for the systematic sequencing of complex genomes. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 573-583 (2001). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  5. Ouellette, B.F.F. & Boguski, M.S. Database divisions and homology search files: a guide for the perplexed. Genome Res. 7, 952-955 (1997). | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  6. Bairoch, A. & Apweiler, R. The SWISS-PROT Protein Sequence Database and its supplement TREMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 45-48 (2000). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  7. Hubbard, T. et al. The Ensembl Genome Database Project. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 38-41 (2002). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  8. Kent, W.J. BLAT--the BLAST-like Alignment Tool. Genome Res. 12, 656-664 (2002). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  9. Stein, L. Genome annotation: from sequence to biology. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 493-503 (2001). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  10. Pruitt, K.D. & Maglott, D.R. RefSeq and LocusLink: NCBI gene-centered resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 137-140 (2001). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  11. Burge, C.B. & Karlin, S. Finding the genes in genomic DNA. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 346-354 (1998). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  12. Schuler, G.D. Electronic PCR: bridging the gap between genome mapping and genome sequencing. Trends Biotechnol. 16, 456-459 (1998). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  13. Sherry, S.T. et al. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 308-311 (2001). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  14. Hamosh, A. et al. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 52-55 (2002). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  15. Baxevanis, A.D. & Ouellette, B.F.F. (eds.) Bioinformatics: A Practical Guide to the Analysis of Genes and Proteins (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001).
  16. Solovyev, V.V., Salamov, A.A. & Lawrence, C.B. Identification of human gene structure using linear discriminant functions and dynamic programming. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 3, 367-375 (1995). | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  17. Yeh, R.F., Lim, L.P. & Burge, C.B. Computational inference of homologous gene structures in the human genome. Genome Res. 11, 803-816 (2001). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  18. Marchler-Bauer, A. et al. CDD: a database of conserved domain alignments with links to domain three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 281-283 (2002). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  19. Apweiler, R. et al. InterPro--an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites. Bioinformatics 16, 1145-1150 (2000). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  20. Rebhan, M., Chalifa-Caspi, V., Prilusky, J. & Lancet, D. GeneCards: a novel functional genomics compendium with automated data mining and query reformulation support. Bioinformatics 14, 656-664 (1998). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  21. Blake, J.A., Richardson, J.E., Bult, C.J., Kadin, J.A. & Eppig, J.T. The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): the model organism database for the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 113-115 (2002). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  22. Hudson, T.J. et al. A radiation hybrid map of mouse genes. Nature Genet. 29, 201-205 (2001). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  23. Bateman, A. et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 276-280 (2002). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  24. Letunic, I. et al. Recent improvements to the SMART domain-based sequence annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 242-244 (2002). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  25. Altschul, S.F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389-3402 (1997). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  26. Durbin, R., Eddy, S., Krogh, A. & Mitchison, G. Biological Sequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998).
  27. Peri, S., Ibarrola, N., Blagoev, B., Mann, M. & Pandey, A. Common pitfalls in bioinformatics-based analyses: look before you leap. Trends Genet. 17, 541-545 (2001) [erratum Trends Genet. 18, 218 (2002)]. | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  28. Ponting, C. Issues in predicting protein function from sequence. Brief. Bioinform. 2, 19-29 (2001). | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  29. Aparicio, S.A.J.R. How to count ... human genes. Nature Genet. 25, 129-130 (2000). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  30. Beadle, G.W. & Tatum, E.L. Genetic control of biochemical reactions in Neurospora. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 27, 499-506 (1941). | ChemPort |
  31. Jeffery, C.J., Bahnson, B.J., Chien, W., Ringe, D. & Petsko, G.A. Crystal structure of rabbit phosphoglucose isomerase, a glycolytic enzyme that moonlights as neuroleukin, autocrine motility factor, and differentiation mediator. Biochemistry 39, 955-964 (2000). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  32. Wistow, G. & Piatigorsky, J. Recruitment of enzymes as lens structural proteins. Science 236, 1554-1556 (1987). | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  33. Jeffery, C.J. Moonlighting proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 8-11 (1999). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  34. Chothia, C. Proteins. One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature 357, 543-544 (1992). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  35. Hegyi, H. & Gerstein, M. The relationship between protein structure and function: a comprehensive survey with application to the yeast genome. J. Mol. Biol. 288, 147-164 (1999). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  36. Jansen, R. & Gerstein, M. Analysis of the yeast transcriptome with structural and functional categories: characterizing highly expressed proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 1481-1488 (2000). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  37. Brenner, S.E. Errors in genome annotation. Trends Genet. 15, 132-133 (1999). | Article | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  38. Smith, R.F. Perspectives: sequence data base searching in the era of large-scale genomic sequencing. Genome Res. 6, 653-660 (1996). | PubMed  | ChemPort |

 
TOP
Back to the Home Page
Copyright 2002 Nature Publishing Group   Site GuideFeedback